Change in Japanese Tax Laws Good News for UK Companies

On March 16, 2015, the Japan’s Ministry of Justice announced that it had abolished the local residency requirement that at least one of the representatives of a domestic corporation should have a Japanese address, which often complicated the corporate formation process for overseas entrants into Japan. The change became effective immediately.

Previously, a company formed as a kabushiki kaisha (the equivalent of a stock company) was required under Japanese law to appoint from among its directors at least one individual who was a resident of Japan to serve as the comany’s representative director or local representative based on the pronouncements from the Japanese Civil Affairs Bureau. Simlarly, a godo kaisha (the equivalent of a limited liability company) that had an entity serving as its sole managing member was required to select one individual who was a resident of Japan to serve as an executive officer to perform the duties of the managing member.

Currently, based on this reform, a company can be organized under Japanese law without the need to satisfy a Japanese corporate law local residency requirement. The elimination of the local residency requirement will apply to legal entities that are to be incorporated or established. Examples of these types of legal entities include kabushiki kaishas, godo kaishas and the general partner of a toshi jigyou yugen sekinin kumiai. On the other hand, it should be noted that the elimination of local residency requirements will not apply to the requirement to appoint a tax representative for foreign companies with a PE in Japan since Japanese corporate law still requires that at least one tax representative of foreign companies should be a resident in Japan.

Deloitte’s view

The elimination of local residency requirements should be welcomed by overseas companies that desire:

  • flexibility to utilize overseas personnel to serve as leaders of its Japanese subsidiary,
  • time to hire or replace local talented personnel as leaders of its Japanese subsidiary and,
  • direct oversight to its Japan subsidiary through online or other communication tools.

Under Japanese tax law, tax returns should be signed by the representative of a company to verify the detail of tax returns. Therefore, this procedure would still be required to be appropriately performed if the representative is not a resident of Japan.

Deloitte will also be holding a tax webcast in June 2015. Click to register.

Dbriefs Tax Webcast
Indirect Tax
Cross-border Digital Services: A Brave New World for Indirect Tax?
4 June, 2:00 – 3:00 PM HKT (GMT +8)
Host: Robert Tsang
Presenters: Hong Seok Han, Chikara Okada, Jun Takahara, and Robert Tsang

Following the release of the draft OECD International VAT / GST B2C Guidelines in December 2014 for consultation, a number of countries in Asia Pacific are gearing up to introduce new rules to tax inbound digital services. How are VAT and GST rules likely to evolve and change in the region?

We’ll discuss:

  • How do these rules work – a spotlight on Japan and Korea.
  • Can a non-resident supplier really be subject to consumption tax, GST or VAT obligations?
  • What would this mean for direct tax or business tax purposes?

Understand more about how the VAT / GST rules are shaping across the region and how it may affect your business.

Register for this webcast

For all of our latest Japan-related business news, please see our news and articles page. Our excellent resources include videoscase studies, and in-depth reports that you can use to make informed decisions about your export journey.

Article by Deloitte, May 2015